Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making

نویسندگان

چکیده

AI-assisted decision-making that impacts individuals raises critical questions about transparency and fairness in artificial intelligence (AI). Much research has highlighted the reciprocal relationships between transparency/explanation decision-making. Thus, considering their impact on user trust or perceived simultaneously benefits responsible use of socio-technical AI systems, but currently receives little attention. In this paper, we investigate effects explanations human-AI fairness, respectively, specific AI-based scenarios. A study simulating two health insurance medical treatment scenarios provided important insights. Due to global pandemic restrictions thereof, studies were conducted as online surveys. From participant’s perspective, was found affect only under condition a low level, with level reducing trust. However, adding helped users increase perspective our work levels introduced decreased users’ perceptions while high increased fairness. The addition definitely perception Furthermore, application influenced results show statements applications is complex: need consider not type degree introduced, also which used.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fairness in Decision-Making – The Causal Explanation Formula

AI plays an increasingly prominent role in society since decisions that were once made by humans are now delegated to automated systems. These systems are currently in charge of deciding bank loans, criminals’ incarceration, and the hiring of new employees, and it’s not difficult to envision that they will in the future underpin most of the decisions in society. Despite the high complexity enta...

متن کامل

Fairness and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision-Making*

We experimentally test competing theories of three-player majoritarian bargaining models with fixed, known disagreement values. Subjects are randomly assigned to three roles: a proposer and two types of voters. Each role is randomly assigned a disagreement value, i.e. a given amount of money he/she will receive if the proposal is rejected. These values are known to all players before any decisi...

متن کامل

Fairness and intentionality in children’s decision-making

Few studies have addressed the role of different aspects of the Theory of Mind (ToM) (intentionality and false belief understanding) in decision-making by adults playing strategic games where the importance of fairness is crucial. Even more interesting, this topic has been less investigated with children. The goal of this research was to explore the development of the decisional behavior along ...

متن کامل

Fairness informs social decision making in infancy

The ability to reason about fairness plays a defining role in the development of morality. Thus, researchers have long been interested in understanding when and how a sensitivity to fairness first develops. Here, we examined infants' ability to use fairness information in selecting social partners. Using a novel experimental paradigm that combined pre-recorded stimuli with an active behavioral ...

متن کامل

Fairness in Multi-Agent Sequential Decision-Making

We define a fairness solution criterion for multi-agent decision-making problems, where agents have local interests. This new criterion aims to maximize the worst performance of agents with a consideration on the overall performance. We develop a simple linear programming approach and a more scalable game-theoretic approach for computing an optimal fairness policy. This game-theoretic approach ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Machine learning and knowledge extraction

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2504-4990']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/make4020026